Monday, June 11, 2007

Blog changes and public transportation

I have the honor this week of announcing a few changes in BlogSupergroup! After a long series of emails among each other, we’re going to be adding some new regular bloggers and creating space for some guest bloggers as well. Our guest bloggers will include a few names you’ll recognize as regular contributors in our blog and comments sections as well as some new faces. I’ll let these people introduce themselves with their first post.

I will, though, introduce a new regular blogger, Martin, who went to school with Glenn and me and currently lives in Kyoto, Japan. Martin has a lot of interesting stuff to say, and certainly adds a different point of view to the blog. Now that I’ve vouched for him, he has to come through or I’ll loose face with these 'friends of ours' (or maybe I’ve been watching too many mob movies lately). Hope you enjoy the changes, and we’ll always take feedback. There will be another addition to regular bloggers later in the week as well.

Now to the topic of the week…

-------------------------------------------------

I was talking with a friend recently about one of our favorite topics (especially now that Sopranos has ended), climate change. We agreed that one way to help the problem is to encourage people to use public transportation more often instead of their personal vehicles. When we talked about how to do this, however, he called me a Republican and threatened to end our relationship. Good naturedly, I assure you. :)

I happen to live in a city with a very good and safe transportation (compared to a lot of other places) that I use everyday, so it’s hard for me to step back and see these things from the point of view of someone who chooses to drive themselves rather than use the subways, buses, or trains when they’re available. Full disclosure: I own a car that I park on the street and use exclusively on the weekends to either leave town for a weekend trip or to do grocery shopping and Target runs in Virginia.

The first thing most of us consider is to make driving for regular commuters cost prohibitive. I worry, though, that too many changes would make owning a car impossible for any but the rich, especially in urban environments. Raising the price of parking and car taxes mostly hurts people who live in the city and probably already take public transportation because they’re already close to where they need to go. I’m probably one of the only people who think that rising gas prices are not a terrible thing (although, I’ll admit that I do complain about them when I stop every month or two to fill up). However, they don’t seem to do much in the way of encouraging drivers to find other ways to get where they need to go. So what would?

London instituted a commuter tax in 2003, when I happened to be there studying for a semester. There was a big uproar, naturally, from the people who would have to pay 5 pounds every day to enter the city, but most of the media seemed to be in favor of it. I laughed with snarky glee at some of the editorials that lambasted the opponents of the tax as rich suburban snobs who were too stuck-up to endure a ride into town surrounded by their fellow citizens. But honestly, I laughed because I didn’t have a car in London and took subways, buses, and long walks to wherever I needed/wanted to go. This commuter tax idea was mentioned in Washington not long ago, but died quickly and without a whimper. Could something like this ever pass in the US? And is it even working in Britain ?

Obviously, increasing the availability of public transportation is essential to promoting it. As long as people have an excuse not to use it, they won’t. Some of us, at certain points of our lives can make choices around this. For example, after college, two of my best friends asked me about moving to south Florida with them and sharing a house. I said no largely because I can’t stand the idea of having to drive down the interstate or a major highway just to stop by the store after work. I find south Florida, especially the Ft. Lauderdale area, to be too sprawling and inaccessible for my taste. Being fresh out of college and unemployed, I had the option to choose a more metropolitan area where things were close enough together to make public transportation feasible. But having that kind of freedom is not something that happens too many times in one’s life.

And what about places like San Francisco? I don’t have a link to back me up here, but I understand that they have a pretty good transit system, but most people drive anyway. Why?

What does it take to get people less reliant on their own transportation and more willing to use energy- and pollution-efficient public transportation? Will the federal government ever pass bans or limits that force people into taking better care? Or maybe I’m looking at this all wrong and there are better, easier ways to save our own hides (besides those $4 florescent light bulbs that Al Gore talked me into buying…grrrr)? What do you think?

7 comments:

DCP said...

Wow, blue? Also, hows come everybody else gets a new photo besides Stephanie and me? I have a beard now, you know.

Anyway, I would be all for making driving cost prohibitive if everywhere in America had decent public transportation. However, I have never lived in a city with decent public transit, and I currently live in the fourth largest city in America.

Perhaps some government programs to improve public transportation would help. When I lived in Orlando and took the Lynx bus system, it would be a three and a half hour commute from my apartment to UCF on the bus, while it was a 15 minute drive by car. I have never taken the buses here in Houston, but I understand it is similar.

Also, American cities are much more spread out than European cities, so I don't think the European model of higher gas prices would work here. USA, USA, USA!

I don't know what that last part is all about.

Sean said...

When I was living in Montreal, one idea that came up and went quickly away (though it apparently comes up every few years) is to shut the whole downtown core off to traffic. I think it's a fabulous idea, in Montreal in particular, where they have an excellent public transit system. Any downtown core of a city built before 1950 is easily navigable by foot.

Actively discouraging drivers is one tactic, but I think subsidising public transit is another. In Canada, cities aren't receiving enough federal funds to run their systems adequately in most cases. In the States, from what I see, the problem is that cities and suburbs want nothing to do with each other, and therefore there is no entity with enough human and financial capital to improve the situation. (this resistance to centralization has all sorts of other manifestations in American society, and this is another).

Stephanie said...

Glenn - I totally thought the same thing- Ill have to see about getting a recent pic, because as of Saturday I have an asymmertrical haircut with cranberry -colored streaks

As for public transport - hmmm...I think we're too used to being on our own, in our own little world. When you can be so connected, and yet disconnected with cell phone, ipod and the like, why not go all the way and just drive yourself and not have to stand next to the smelly bum on the subway?

MagDef said...

If rublic transportation is what you're after, I've got two suggestions for you. (realized afterwards that this was a type-o, but I'm pretty sure I prefer the word rublic to public, so its staying...kind of gives me the authority of the Jetson's dog, which is A.LOT.)


1) Move to Japan, because the public transportation here is incredible. And yet, credible (can someone explain THAT hole in the English language to me?)

b) Buy a good road bike for a couple of thousand dollars instead of a huge car for a couple of couple of thousand dollars. They're fast, and no one's ever gotten a yellow jerzeee from driving an Espresso, or whatever Ford has recently come up with to deal with the overwhelming demand for SUVs as well as the recent (anti)climatic panic. That and riding a bike everyday you'll get that really sexy V that leads from your love handles to your junk.

7) Freeze yourself in a meat locker and wait until we have developed teleportation technology.

5,356c) get so fat that you can't get through your front door. Public transportation will become the least of your worries.

(there are more, but after 6,360 they just get silly.)

Also- is the order of the pictures the order in which we are supposed to be blogging?

Thanks for allowing me on the team. I'll try not to dissapoint you (but I might anyway.)

annie said...

Glenn and Stephanie - I totally would have put up new pics of you cats but, when trolling your MySpace pages for pics, I found nothing new! Anyway, send me new pics (don't worry about the size, I'll crop/resize) and I'll post them.

Martin - your comment reminded me of that episode from the Simpsons where Dr. Nick says in an incredulous voice: "Inflammable means flammable?!"

MagDef said...

Jane,

I am honored to be compared to a doctor who got his degree at Hollywood Upstairs Medical College (which happens to be the same place I got mine). Also like Dr. Nick, I have my "Club Med School" and "Female Body Inspector" diplomas on my wall, although that doesn't bode well for me with this group (ahem...Jen...close ahem).
And lastly, I, too am shocked at this new learnin!!! Looks like I'll have to go and repaint all my suits.

Anonymous said...

I have spent nearly the last year blissfully not driving in the craziness that is South Korean traffic; however, I've come close to being run over numerous times by drivers of cars, trucks, mopeds, and even bicycles while hugging the sidewalks. Cars even use the sidewalks as streets here.

I used to live in Houston, L.A., and N.Y.C., and only N.Y.C. has decent public transportation due to its compact layout and abundance of apartments. Americans like their own mcmansions for all of three or four inhabitants--talk about a waste of electricity, heat, and air conditioning. We also like our big, spacious automobiles. The country is very spread out and people don't live next door to their jobs, so a large, comfortable vehicle makes more sense than a fuel efficient tin can that you can't even shoehorn the groceries into.

I for one am all for outlawing large houses and apartments, large and medium size vehicles, and giving everyone single citizen the same amount gas, electricity, natural gas, etc. Damn, that sounds like socialism, and who would want to work hard to make money to afford the better things in life then? Would the world then stagnate, if everyone had the same amount of goods and services? Would a doctor care about a patient's well-being as much if they made the same pay as a fast food worker? Would scientists work as hard to find cures for diseases and invent new drugs if there is no million dollar payday in it for them? At least teachers would be paid what athletes and movie stars make--that's some justice.

Climate change won't be taken seriously until the Al Gores of this world actually lead by example. If he, and other outspoken political voices of the earth's imminent demise, actually gave up their mcmansions, limos, and private plane trips, the majority of the population might actually be more inclined to do something about saving "their" world.

What's the old adage? Things usually get "much" worse, before they get better.

John from Daejeon